This Jalisco anthropomorphic figure dates to just
before or after the start of the first millennium
AD, and represents a mother and her child. The
Jalisco cultures of Western Mexico are
comparatively understudied compared to the
Maya and Olmec cultures, among many others,
that inhabited other areas in the region. The
reasons for this are unclear, although it is
possible that they have been overshadowed due
to their lack of monumental architecture.
This, however, has been an enormous oversight
because there are few cultures in the Americas or
indeed elsewhere that can match the Jalisco for
exuberant skill in the production of figurative
ceramics. These wares were usually placed in
graves, and do not seem to have performed any
practical function, although highly decorated
utilitarian vessels are also known. It is possible
that they were designed to depict the deceased –
they are often very naturalistic – although it is
more probable that they constituted, when in
groups, a retinue of companions, protectors and
servants for the hereafter. Many of the figures
represent warriors, judging from their apparel
and martial stance. These were probably
protectors of the deceased, symbolic of actual
people who were buried with the deceased as
retainers in more sanguineous Central and
Southern American societies. Supernatural and
more enigmatic figures are also known,
presumably representing aspects of Jalisco
cultural heritage (gods, spirits, ancestors,
mythological figures etc) that cannot be
understood at the present time. However,
perhaps the best-known style is that of the
maternity figure, of which this is an exceptional
example.
The figure represents a female,
kneeling in a supplicatory position, and grasping
her child to her right breast. She is naked to the
waist, from which point she wears a glossy white
slip-covered ‘skirt’ that is secured by wrapping
around her hips. The skin on her torso is a rich,
deep, orange-brown, oddly contrasting with the
pale, matte skin on her face. The child is also
pale and unpainted except for slight overflow of
brush-strokes; this is likely to have some
significance, as the modeling of the child is
much less painstaking than that of the adult.
Current theories concerning maturation of
children in the Americas suggest that they did
not attain any social significance until about 7-9
years of age and out of reach of the usual
childhood diseases. Her left hand holds her
breast, the other supporting her child. Her
expression is solemn, bordering on lugubrious.
This is accentuated by her long face,
expressionless oval eyes, elongated nose and
pursed lips, which yet provide a strange dignity
of mood.
Other than her skirt, she wears
only an armlet on her left upper arm, disc-
shaped ear ornaments and a simple headdress.
The shape of her frontal suggests that this is a
depiction of an individual with intentional cranial
deformation, specifically the fronto-occipital
variety. While deformations are not uncommon in
ancient American society, they are usually
associated with social elites, and while this would
not be sufficient to make such a judgment in
isolation, the jewellery the figure is also wearing
supports such an assertion.
The role of
such
a figure is uncertain without contextual
information. While obviously ornamental and a
funerary figure, it is likely to have been involved
with some form of invocation for fertility, for
good fortune, or for familial stability and/or
success. Of course, it may be a portrait of a
specific mother, and – as reflected by the
difference in modeling – a generic, imagined
(future?) or non-specific child. It may also be
more widely symbolic, of fertility in terms of
agriculture or of climate. In any case, however, it
is an astoundingly well-conceived and executed
piece of ancient art that would stand out in any
collection.