The ancient Egyptians maintained that the sun
was propelled across the heavens by means of a
scarab, or sacred beetle. With the passing of
time, the Egyptians created a series of amulets
in the form of this beetle in a great variety of
materials, and these were routinely provided with
inscriptions in hieroglyphs conveniently
accommodated to their stylized flat bottoms. So
popular was the scarab that it became the one
amulet associated with Egypt by all of her
neighbors, and local variations were created in
imitation of the Egyptian model.
Our scarab is just such a variation. Created in
green jasper, the artist has simplified the
beetle’s upper body so that there is no division
between its thorax and elytra, or wing case,
although he has attempted to suggest their
division by means of an incised dash along each
vertical side of the beetle’s body. The beetle’s
head is suggested by the arrangement of the two
oblique incisions which likewise separate it from
the plate while the clypeus is indicated by series
of incised dashes.
Its bottom surface depicts a symmetrical
composition flanked at the top and bottom by a
bird with wings outstretched in a typical Egyptian
gesture of protection. The schematic design of
this bird precludes its precise ornithological
identification, but it is assuredly intended to be
identified as a sky deity, either the goddess Mut
depicted as a vulture or the god Horus depicted
as a falcon. Two royal ovals, containing three
identical hieroglyphs, fill the middle field and
these are separated by an ankh-sign.
Our scarab can be assigned to the “Green Jasper
Group,” a specific classification of uniquely
Canaanite scarabs created during the Middle
Bronze Age. These high-quality examples seek
to replicate contemporary ancient Egyptian types,
but were created without a first-hand knowledge
of the ancient Egyptian language with the result
that the hieroglyphs cannot be translated. They
serve, therefore, as decorative elements, but may
have also been possessed of talismanic
properties.
References:
For this particular group of Canaanite scarabs,
see, O. Keel, OBO 88 (1989), pages 211-242;
and for an attempt to “translate” the hieroglyphs
on one of these scarabs, see, K. A. Kitchen, in IEJ
39 (1989), pages 278-280.